The Guardian is trying to spin that the public support the war in Afghanistan. I don’t know anyone who understands why the troops are there – the reasons keep changing. First it was to get Bin Laden, then to help kids go to school – now what?
The Morning Star isn’t spinning anything – which is probably why the newspaper reviews on Sky or BBC News don’t feature the country’s socialist daily.
Here’s their editorial:
Put a stop to blood-lettingSunday 12 July 2009
We make no apologies for returning to the subject of Afghanistan for two days in quick succession in this column.
For, hard on the heels of Saturday’s editorial came one of the most ludicrous statements ever made by Prime Minister Gordon Brown, closely followed by yet more drivel from Defence Secretary Bob Ainsworth.
This was supplemented by a contribution from US President Barack Obama which purported to be an expression of sympathy to the families of British soldiers killed in Afghanistan but was clearly an attempt to back up his faithful British lapdog Brown.
A total of 184 British servicemen and women have now been killed in Afghanistan since operations began in 2001 – surpassing the death toll of 179 in Iraq.
And for what? Messrs Brown, Ainsworth and Obama assure us that it is to prevent al-Qaida attacks in London, New York and points west.
But quite how this is to be done is always conveniently glossed over, and to claim a developing success on the back of the bloodiest week of the entire campaign is as cynical as it is unworthy.
The identification of the Taliban with al-Qaida exists only in the imagination of Western politicians.
For, if al-Qaida is anything at all, it is an organisation that exists across borders with no direct national links to any one country.
Its mobility, flexibility and lack of a national identity mean that, quite simply, it cannot be defeated by conventional military action and any attempt to do so is doomed to failure.
It is undoubtedly in political, not military, actions that any resolution to the problem exists.
And it is not the British army’s task to deliver civilian aid and economic development, the objectives that first John Reid and latterly Mr Ainsworth have identified.
One wonders at the lack of ability to learn from earlier mistakes of our political figureheads.
Can Mr Brown, not a fool by anyone’s standards, really not see that al-Qaida was not a problem in Iraq until the war began? Why can’t he draw the obvious conclusion that a similar intervention in Afghanistan will result in a similar outcome?
And can he really believe that, in the highly unlikely event of any great military success by Britain and the US, al-Qaida will vanish from the scene entirely?
No-one involved in international politics can surely be that foolish or that naive.
And what happens if the Western allies drive al-Qaida elements from Afghanistan into Pakistan?
Neither Mr Brown nor Mr Obama can surely be reckless enough to believe that their war without end can be extended into that country.
No, the answer to the growing problem of Islamist terrorism does not lie in the military might of the West, but in international politics.
It lies in justice for the Palestinians and the establishment of a Palestinian state, in controlling Israel and guaranteeing the integrity of Palestinian borders.
Islamist terrorism arose from a sense of massive injustice at the maltreatment of the Palestinians and from the growing habit of the West of using Islamic countries as the site of its wars of acquisition and political control.
And it is in remedying those injustices that a solution to this problem lies.
Not in importing ever more soldiers and ever-heavier armour into a country which they cannot subdue.
And not in continuing to spill the blood of the sons and daughters of Britain onto the ground of Afghanistan, a country which is not guilty of any acts of aggression against Britain, any more than Iraq was of having weapons of mass destruction.
War without end is an unworthy means of achieving an unworthy goal. Both our own soldiers and the Afghan people deserve better of this unworthy leadership.