1,236,085 people sign petition opposing commercialisation of English GP services

These “reforms” (remember when that meant an improvement?) will not be imposed in Scotland, Wales, or Northern Ireland, which have devolved government, unlike England.

From today’s News Line:

Friday, 13 June 2008
DARZAI MUST RESIGN! – says the GPs conference!
FAMILY doctors yesterday expressed their furious opposition to privately-run polyclinics and voted to take ‘unprecedented action’ in response to ‘unprecedented political threats to general practice’.

GPs voted unanimously for Motion 32 at the British Medical Association (BMA) Local Medical Committees (LMCs) annual conference in central London, which supported the BMA’s ‘Support your Surgery’ campaign

In a combined debate, the over 400 delegates called for health minister Darzi to resign, voting no confidence in him as health minister, his review of general practice and no confidence in his ‘ability to carry out a review of the NHS that is independent of political control and free of a predetermined outcome’.

BMA GPs Committee Chairman Dr Laurence Buckman was applauded throughout his keynote speech attacking the ‘commercialisation of the NHS’.

He slammed PFI and polyclinics, warning: ‘The dumbing down of general practice will spell the end of the generalist who can offer holistic care.

‘It will see the rise of clinics further away from the patients they serve and providing much less of the personal care and commitment they value.’

Buckman received a standing ovation when he announced: ‘At 2 o’clock today I will be proud to knock on the door of Number 10 and hand in a petition signed by 1,236,085 people in England.

‘It will deliver a stark message to the Prime Minister that the public petitions to him continue to support our existing NHS GP surgeries and improve services to patients by further investment in them.’

He stressed: ‘Voters don’t want funding to move from GP practices to commercial companies who are accountable primarily to shareholders rather than patients.

‘They want to be treated as patients, not customers.’

Buckman received another, longer standing ovation when he concluded: ‘So, what’s it going to be government: peace and construction, or a never-ending fight to protect the NHS? I’m game for either.’

Moving Motion 32, Dr Kailash Chand, West Pennine LMC, said: ‘This government is morally bankrupt and stone deaf.

‘Our campaign must continue. The public must know.’

Warning against government ‘reforms’ plans, he added: ‘If we ignore this, we are sleepwalking into the destruction of the NHS by marketisation, privatisation and commercialisation.’

Opposing polyclinics, he stressed: ‘As GPs we have to defend the NHS.’

Advising conference, Dr Buckman said: ‘You could misunderstand unprecedented action, but I oppose a reference back.

‘We are already taking unprecedented action. It depends on what the government does – being nice to us would be unprecedented.’

Earlier, GPs voted unanimously for Motion 10 which underlined that ‘the vast majority of patients want and need’ care provided by ‘permanent, properly-trained GPs’.

It warned ‘this form of care is being undermined’ by government encouragement of direct commercial competition.

GPs also voted unanimously ‘no confidence in the UK government’s stewardship of the NHS’ and overwhelmingly for a rider ‘no confidence in the secretary of state for health’.

Buckman intervened to oppose the rider, ‘saying we don’t do personal’ but mover Dr Eric Rose of Buckinghamshire LMC replied: ‘When someone bullies me – that’s personal.

‘When someone bankrupts a practice I’ve built up over 40 years – that’s personal!’

Advertisements

One Response to “1,236,085 people sign petition opposing commercialisation of English GP services”

  1. tally Says:

    There was also another motion that was not voted on.

    http://www.healthcarerepublic.com/rss/news/article/816797/LMCs-reject-move-split-England-UK-funding/

    LMCs reject move to split England from UK on funding
    13-Jun-08
    English GPs threatened to split from their Celtic colleagues at the LMCs conference, over the question of how the GP defence fund should be paid for.
    Cambridgeshire LMC proposed that the voluntary levy which pays for the fund should be varied between the UK’s four nations, so that money can be directed to where it is most needed.

    They pointed to variation in healthcare spending and prescription charges as evidence that GPs face different threats across the four countries.

    But GPs from Scotland and Wales argued that the motion posed a threat to the profession’s unity.

    ‘We have the same contract. It needs to be defended jointly,’ said Dr Mike Griffiths, from Gwent LMC.

    Dr John Ip, from Glasgow LMC, added: ‘Politicians would love us to start squabbling over this.’

    Conference declined to vote on the motion.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: