Not playing to the gallery – Brown’s tax plans could cost him dear

On the front cover of this week’s Socialist Worker (available from all good high streets) a summary of who gains and who loses under the new simplified tax system:

LOSER: Call centre worker
Abolition of bottom rate tax band will hit a 24 year old who earns less than £18,000 a year, but must now pay £232 more tax a year

WINNER: Big business
Corporation tax has been reduced again – to just 28 percent – ensuring that Barclays’ £7 billion profits stay with the rich

LOSER: Pensioner
Like more than 1.9 million other people, a pensioner whose income is £6,500 a year pays more than 40p in tax for every extra £1 they earn

On the inside pages, there’s more on New Labour’s abolition of the 10p rate of tax for the low paid:

While some of the poorest workers in Britain are now forced to pay hundreds of pounds more in tax, in the London boardrooms of the world’s richest companies there was joy as corporation tax was slashed.

This is Labour’s third cut to the tax on profits since 1997. Under Margaret Thatcher’s Tory government, corporation tax was 52 percent. This week Brown reduced it from 30 percent to 28 percent – the lowest of the G7 leading industrialised countries.

New Labour’s double standards make a mockery of its claim to be “lifting people out of poverty” and has sent a wave of anger among Labour supporters, even those who think of themselves as loyal to the party.

Millions of Labour voters rightly believe that the tax system should be used to help the poorest by redistributing wealth from the rich to the poor.

They think that those at the bottom end of the income scale should be paying a lower rate of tax, while those at the top should be paying the highest. This week’s changes reveal that Brown’s government is determined to do the opposite.

The abolition of the starting rate will hit young workers without families particularly hard. Those earning less than £18,500 a year stand to lose up to £232 a year – a lot of money when you are scrimping to put food on the table while paying the rent.

But it is not just the young and single who will be out of pocket. Around 1.2 million double income couples with no children and 700,000 double income couples with children will also be paying more. As will 300,000 women aged between 60 and 64.

Brown’s startled response to the political furore over tax has been to claim that his regime of tax credits and child tax credits will make up for the shortfall. But he knows this is a lie.

Lack of information and a cumbersome application process means that only 40 percent of those entitled to tax credits claim them – dropping to just a quarter of single people on low incomes. Those under 25 without children are not even eligible.

Those who do manage to obtain tax credits often find that they become caught in a trap where any extra money they earn can be wiped out by taxes.

The Treasury’s own figures show that 1.9 million people – including about half of all pensioners – whose income exceeds £6,500 a year are allowed to keep just less than 40p of every extra £1 they earn.

When the total of all deductions, including national insurance, are taken into account those people are paying rates of tax on extra earnings of between 60 and 90 percent.

This week’s tax changes will mean a million more people are caught in this trap. The number affected is equivalent to more than the population of Birmingham and Manchester combined.

However Gordon Brown’s world is full of stark contrasts. Multi-millionaire Labour donor Lord Sainsbury showed how New Labour is working for the rich. Last week he transferred most of his 8 percent stake in the Sainsbury’s supermarket to a company he controls, in the process avoiding a £27 million tax bill.

Yet even Brown’s new 28 percent corporation tax is too much for some top firms to bear. The top 50 companies in Britain have an average effective corporation tax of just 22 percent.

Already those at the bottom end of the economic scale are struggling as they pay a bigger proportion of their wages on essentials such as food and fuel, which have shot up in price.

By limiting pay rises for public sector workers to below inflation the government is making the pain far worse, creating a seething political anger.

Last week the Experian credit agency revealed that 5.1 million households are close to not being able to pay all their bills, including mortgages. Three out of four of those are in Labour constituencies. That’s around eight million voters.

And there’s local elections in England on May 1st, with mayoral and Assembly elections taking place in London on the same day…


One Response to “Not playing to the gallery – Brown’s tax plans could cost him dear”

  1. Seán Says:

    The biggest obstacle to socialism or even social democracy in this country is the Labour parrty. It has outlived its historical usefulness. At this point in history, there is no need for this backward, reactionary entity. Politics in this country is akin to America: one party of business with two wings.

    Fuck Brown, fuck labour…and don’t give that weasly response it is not ‘real’ labour, it’s New labour…It’s over.

    Yet, the void is fucking massive. Only the unions can protect us at the moment. And I don’t have much faith in them either.

    It’s the economy stupid. The working class are hurting like they were in the 80s. A new movement is required.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: