England’s inequality sickness

Another triumph for New Liebore:

Despite a pledge to cut the health gap between the richest and poorest, the difference in life expectancy is widening, a government report shows.

The aim is to reduce the differences in male and female life expectancy by 10% by 2010.

But the report shows the gap between those in the most deprived areas of England and the rest of the country is getting worse.

The government said inequalities were “difficult to change.”

Yes, especially when you’re not trying and in fact pushing policies which exacerbate inequalities…

The report, the third annual analysis of the implementation of a 2003 strategy to tackle health inequalities, says there have been real improvements.

Life expectancy in the most deprived areas has increased by two and a half years for men and one and a half years for women over the last 10 years.

But the gap in life expectancy for women in the most deprived areas compared with the average was 2% wider in 2004-06 than in 1995-97.

And the gap for women is now 11% wider.

Infant mortality

The difference in the infant mortality rate has been falling in recent years after a 2002 high, it is still significantly higher than it was a decade ago.

For babies whose fathers have a “routine or manual occupation”, the mortality rate in 2004-06 was 17% higher than that for the general population, compared to 13% in 1997-99.

Public health minister Dawn Primarolo said: “This report proves what we already know – health inequalities are difficult to change.

“We’ve set ourselves an ambitious target and we’re the only country in the world to have a plan to reduce health inequalities. We are determined to make a difference.”

She said the 70 local authority areas with the highest level of deprivation now had “health trainers” to help people improve their health, and that there was action to tackle rates of obesity and smoking.

Professor Sir Michael Marmot, who chaired the group which compiled the report, said: “While it is too early to see any short term impact on health inequalities, the report shows a very welcome improvement in life expectancy for all social groups, including disadvantaged groups.

“There are encouraging signs of a reduction in health inequalities in the two big killers of cancer and heart disease.

“Wider policy too makes a difference to health inequalities with over 600,000 children taken out of poverty over the last 10 years.”

Professor Danny Dorling, an expert in human geography at Sheffield University, said the inequalities were now at “unprecedented levels”.

“This is the first Labour or Liberal government to see this gap widen.

“I can see why the government thought that just giving it time and spending money on it would work.

“But it worries me that there will be more excuses rather than an admission of failure.”

One Response to “England’s inequality sickness”

  1. Lorenzo E. Danielsson Says:

    And yet there are those that still claim that personal greed will lead to the greatest common good. I guess that all depends on how one defines “common”. If we exclude all wage-slaves then I guess they are right.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: